Jonathan Reveals Why Ex-EFCC Boss Waziri Was Sacked

Former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Farida Waziri was removed from office in the interest of the nation, former President Goodluck Jonathan has said.

Waziri, who was the anti-graft agency boss from May 2008 to November 2011, in her book, alleged that the former president removed her because she was going after ”oil thieves”.

However, reacting to her allegation in a statement on Monday, Jonathan through his spokesman, Ikechukwu Eze, said he has no personal problem with the former EFCC boss.

According to Jonathan, her sack was not personal and that he had retained her when he assumed office despite international call for her sacking.

The former Nigerian leader asked Waziri not to continue to be bitter and angry over the loss of the position because it is a call to service and not an entitlement.

READ MORE:  Jega Reveals Nigeria’s Biggest Problem

“We read media reports credited to the former boss of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mrs. Farida Waziri, in which she claimed in her new book that she was removed from office by ex-President Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, because of her probe of some oil racketeers,” the statement read.

“We thought we had dealt with this matter, after promptly debunking similar statements she made in the past. In 2017 when she claimed that she lost her job because she ‘refused to back down from the probe of one of the masterminds of the fuel subsidy scam’, we quickly refuted and clarified the claim for the records, and even challenged her to name the individual or company in question.

“We had expected that a book from Mrs. Farida, coming years after the claim was first made, should have towed the path of honour by telling the truth for the benefit of history. Unfortunately, that still didn’t happen.

READ MORE:  Amotekun: Group Announce Northern Security Outfit, ‘Shege-Ka-Fasa’

“It will be recalled that after assuming office as President on May 6, 2010, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan decided to retain Mrs. Waziri, who was appointed by his predecessor, late President Umaru Yar’Adua, as the head of the elite anti-crime agency. Despite obvious disenchantment from many Nigerians and mounting international pressure against Mrs. Waziri’s continued stay in office, the former President stood by her, in line with his conviction that every public officer should first be given the opportunity to deliver on his or her mandate.

“It must be pointed out that former President Jonathan had no personal issues with Mrs. Waziri. The former President had to eventually let her go in the national interest. Her removal therefore has a lot to do with reasons relating to Nigeria’s interest and global standing which details Dr. Goodluck Jonathan is obliged to keep as state secret in our common national interest. It is very important to note that when dealing with the interest of the nation and the performance of the functions of a public office, a determined leader cannot prioritise the interest of an individual.

READ MORE:  FG declares Monday, Tuesday public holidays for Christmas, New Year Celebrations

“It therefore bears repeating here that Mrs Waziri’s removal as chairperson of EFCC had absolutely nothing to do with her purported refusal to desist from probing any oil individual. This claim sounds rather superficial and contradicts available evidence of the then government’s genuine efforts to combat oil subsidy racketeering.

“It is noteworthy that throughout President Jonathan’s tenure, he made practical efforts to combat the alleged oil cabals, including directing the stoppage of further payment of fuel subsidy claims to oil importers, and the setting up of the Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede-led committee which had high level representation from all the intelligence agencies including the EFCC, with a mandate to thoroughly investigate the scandals in the industry. The choice of Aig-Aigboje, a man widely acclaimed for his dependability, as leader of the committee, was a clear demonstration that the President had no personal interest in the matter.”

Show More
Back to top button